Posted by Axiom Mortgage in
Market News
The Office of the Superintendent Financial Institutions (OSFI) recently proposed a draft of guidelines that, if adopted, would change the way banks underwrite residential mortgages.
For the most part, the proposed changes are things you would expect the banks to be doing anyway -- and many of them are. Putting these rules on paper would simply require all lenders to do them. A few of the other proposed changes are a little more controversial -- specifically those rules surrounding Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs).
Below is a summary of some of the proposed changes:
The borrower’s identity, background and demonstrated willingness to service their debt
obligations on a timely basis (Principle 2);
The borrower’s capacity to service their debt obligations on a timely basis (Principle 3);
and,
The underlying property value/collateral and management process (Principle 4)he borrower’s identity, background and demonstrated willingness to service their debt obligations on a timely basis (Principle 2); The borrower’s capacity to service their debt obligations on a timely basis (Principle 3); and, The underlying property value/collateral and management process (Principle 4).
- Mortgage default insurance (mortgage insurance) is often used as a risk mitigation strategy. However, mortgage insurance should not be a substitute for sound underwriting practices and should not be considered a substitute for conducting adequate due diligence on the borrower, or for using other risk proxies such as the minimum down payment.
- Loan To Value ratio should not be relied upon solely to assess the borrower’s demonstrated willingness and capacity to repay a mortgage.
- In addition to income and debt service coverage, a lender's assessment of a borrower’s capacity to service their debt obligations should include, where possible, substantiation of the borrower’s: Assets (e.g., savings, mutual funds and other investments); Current and anticipated living expenses (taking into account the composition of the household); Property ownership expenses (e.g., maintenance costs); and Recourse to repayment capacity from other sources, including guarantees, income, insurance or social support payments.
- When it comes to HELOCs, lenders should expect full repayment over time, and monitor the borrowers’ credit quality. The HELOC component of a residential mortgage should not be more than 65 percent of the value of the home (the current maximum is 80%).
- HELOCs should have clearly articulated amortization requirements in place for all outstanding HELOC balances. This could either include clearly-defined period (e.g., 5 years), after which the outstanding balance of the HELOC converts to a fixed-term with a reasonable amortization period; or a set percentage of the outstanding balance of the HELOC due each month that equates to a reasonable amortization period.
Basically, OSFI thinks it should be a lot more difficult to obtain a HELOC -- and banks should thoroughly scrutinize all residential mortgage applicants. For the full report, visit http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/app/DocRepository/1/eng/guidelines/sound/guidelines/b20_dft_e.pdf.